Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal from orders dismissing two actions brought to recover Utah use taxes assessed and collected pursuant to 59-13-73, 6 Utah Code Annotated, 1953, from appellants Mar-quardt and Thiokol on their use of tax exempt federal land in the performance *170of their contracts with the appellant United States.
The Utah statute imposes “a tax upon the possession or other beneficial use enjoyed by any private individual * * * of any property * * * which for any reason is exempt from taxation, when such property is used in connection with a business conducted for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States of America, Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc. And Cashman Equipment Co. v. Nevada Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Homestake-Sapin Partners v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Community Unit School District No. 200Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Allen v. Tooele CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- United States of America: Aerojet General Corp. v. State Ex Rel. BekoNevada Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.