Legal Opinion

Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1966No. Nos. 8309, 8310PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal from orders dismissing two actions brought to recover Utah use taxes assessed and collected pursuant to 59-13-73, 6 Utah Code Annotated, 1953, from appellants Mar-quardt and Thiokol on their use of tax exempt federal land in the performance *170of their contracts with the appellant United States.

The Utah statute imposes “a tax upon the possession or other beneficial use enjoyed by any private individual * * * of any property * * * which for any reason is exempt from taxation, when such property is used in connection with a business conducted for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States of America, Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc. And Cashman Equipment Co. v. Nevada Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. Homestake-Sapin Partners v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Community Unit School District No. 200Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Allen v. Tooele CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. United States of America: Aerojet General Corp. v. State Ex Rel. BekoNevada Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API