Baker v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
The appellants commenced this action against appellee insurance company upon a policy of fire insurance issued by it, alleging that it undertook and did insure their interest as mortgagees in a grain separator and engine.
The appellee insurance company answered by a demurrer, and specially pleaded as its principal defense a mortgage foreclosure provision in the policy which is alleged- to have been violated, thereby releasing it from liability.
Appellee, W. B. Birchum, the mortgagor, was made a party defendant for the purpose of decreeing that he had no interest in the policy of insurance. He…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eddy v. London Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Aetna Insurance Co., of Hartford v. BrannonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Citizens State Bank v. Shawnee Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Michigan State Insurance v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Smith v. Germania Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fitch v. LomaxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Logue v. DucheneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- H. D. Dean v. The Pioneer Co-Operative Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- American Casualty & Life Co. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.