Legal Opinion

Baker v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1925No. 6855PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The appellants commenced this action against appellee insurance company upon a policy of fire insurance issued by it, alleging that it undertook and did insure their interest as mortgagees in a grain separator and engine.

The appellee insurance company answered by a demurrer, and specially pleaded as its principal defense a mortgage foreclosure provision in the policy which is alleged- to have been violated, thereby releasing it from liability.

Appellee, W. B. Birchum, the mortgagor, was made a party defendant for the purpose of decreeing that he had no interest in the policy of insurance. He…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eddy v. London Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Aetna Insurance Co., of Hartford v. BrannonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Citizens State Bank v. Shawnee Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Michigan State Insurance v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Smith v. Germania Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fitch v. LomaxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Logue v. DucheneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. H. D. Dean v. The Pioneer Co-Operative Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. American Casualty & Life Co. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API