Legal Opinion
Bloodsworth v. SMITH & NEPHEW
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided February 17, 2006No. 2:05CV622-DPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DE MENT, Senior District Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiffs Mary and Jerry Bloodsworth’s motion to remand in which Plaintiffs assert that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking in this cause which was removed from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama. 1 (Doc. No. 9.) For the reasons to follow, the court finds that Plaintiffs’ motion is due to be denied.
Previously, the court entered a memorandum opinion and order (“Order”) in the above-styled cause, finding that one of the two resident Defendants had been fraudulently joined in this products liability lawsuit. (Doc. No. 22.)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Triggs v. John Crump Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Waddell & Reed, Inc. v. UNITED INVEST. LIFE INS. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Mancel E. Tedder v. F.M.C. Corporation, Appeal of F.M.C. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.