Legal Opinion
Fankhauser v. Bucyrus Police Dept.
Ohio Court of Claims
Decided May 29, 2026No. 2026-00110PQPublished
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Fankhauser v. Bucyrus Police Dept.,
2026-Ohio-2340.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO KURT FANKHAUSER Case No. 2026-00110PQ Requester Special Master Sarah Pierce v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BUCYRUS POLICE DEPARTMENT Respondent {¶1} This matter is before me for a report and recommendation. R.C.2743.75(F). I recommend that the court (1) deny respondent’s motion to dismiss, (2) grant judgment for requester on his claim that respondent overcharged for production of body-worn camera footage pursuant to R.C. 149.43(B)(1), (3) order respondent to reimburse requester for his filing fee, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- The STATE EX REL. CORDELL v. PADEN, Sheriff.Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- State ex rel. Shaughnessy v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Ware v. Sentence Computation Bur.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State ex rel. Miller v. Ohio Dept. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.