Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Williams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1954No. 18438PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. While it is a well-settled general rule that claims arising ex contractu can not be set off against claims arising ex delicto, except upon equitable grounds, such as insolvency or non-residence (Code § 3-113; Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co., 114 Ga. 921, 41 S. E. 74; Standhardt v. Hardin, 145 Ga. 147, 88 S. E. 565; Strickland v. Bank of Cartersville, 141 Ga. 565, 81 S. E. 886; Aetna Insurance Co. v. Lunsford, 179 Ga. 716, 177 S. E. 727), the plaintiff’s petition in the instant case, seeking to enjoin the defendant from the commission of an alleged threatened tort in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Ray v. Home & Foreign Investment & Agency Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. McCall v. FrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Strickland v. Bank of CartersvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Fender v. HendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API