Legal Opinion

Albertville Trading Co. v. Brooks

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1927No. 8 Div. 424PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The husband of plaintiff, J. T. Brooks, executed to Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank on January 3, 1920, a note and mortgage to secure an indebtedness of $287.05; the mortgage included and conveyed the two mules, the subject of this suit; this note and mortgage was due and payable October 15, 1920, dated at Boaz, in Marshall county, and recorded January 5, 1920, in Dekalb county. The mules were in the possession of J. T. Brooks at the time he executed the mort gage. On June 6, 1920, J. T. Brooks executed a note, secured by a mortgage on tbe same mules, payáble to Albertville Trading Company, for an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graham v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  2. First National Bank v. SproullSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Sanders v. RogersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Lowery v. HaleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wittmeir v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Morgan Plan Co. v. Accounts Supervision Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Sims v. United Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API