Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1941No. Appeals, 6 and 7PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Defendant was convicted of larceny, and of assault and battery, charged in separate indictments but tried by the same jury with the defendant’s consent. Judgments were entered on the verdicts and defendant was sentenced on each.

The conviction in the larceny case rests upon the inferences to be drawn from defendant’s possession of stolen property. Possession of recently stolen property is evidence that the possessor is the thief but it does not raise a legal presumption of guilt and no burden is shifted to the defendant to account for his possession, at his peril. The burden…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StelmaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Boehm v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  3. Commonwealth v. ChesterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Commonwealth v. BerneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Commonwealth v. SchererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Alphonso T. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Chatary v. NailonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. JoyceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. WojdakowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API