Gentry v. Russellville, Alabama, City of
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION CHELSEA GENTRY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:16-cv-1466-LCB ) THE CITY OF RUSSELLVILLE, ) ALABAMA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Chelsea Gentry alleges discrimination and retaliation under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Defendant City of Russellville, Alabama. (Doc. 1, No. 3:16-cv-01466 and Doc. 1, No. 3:17-cv- 01127). Plaintiff also asserts a wage and hour claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 207. (Doc. 1, No.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Alvarez v. Royal Atlantic Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- George W. NIX, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WLCY RADIO/RAHALL COMMUNICATIONS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.