Legal Opinion
Carol Harley v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Carol Harley v. Guillo Agostini
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 26, 2002No. 00-2214, 01-1213Published
1Opinion of the Court
284 F.3d 901
Carol HARLEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Carol Harley, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Guillo Agostini, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-2214.
No. 01-1213.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: March 12, 2001.
Filed: March 26, 2002.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Alan M. Sandals, Philadelphia, PA, argued (Scott M. Lempert, Philadelphia, PA, Seymour J. Mansfield and Debra S. Nelson, Minneapolis, MN, on the brief), for appellant.
John D. French, Minneapolis, MN, argued (Steven L. Severson, Deborah A.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.