Legal Opinion

Brothers v. Howard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1982No. 811DC1107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

The trial court erred in allowing defendants’ motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence on plaintiffs’ cause of action to quiet title.

First, the Real Property Marketable Title Act provides that the establishment of a marketable record title in any person pursuant to the statute shall be prima facie evidence that such person owns title to the real property described in his record chain of title. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 47B-2(d) (Supp. 1981). Plaintiffs have established a marketable record title to the land in dispute by the introduction of the deed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Vance v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Lea v. DudleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Kennedy v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Poore v. Swan Quarter Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. United States v. KubalakDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API