Legal Opinion

Nesbitt v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion *932for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ negligence and Dram Shop claims. The Dram Shop cause of action should not have been dismissed. In opposition to defendants’ motion, plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact on that cause of action. They adduced competent eyewitness and expert opinion testimony tending to establish, circumstantially, that decedent was intoxicated at the time he was sold alcoholic…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scheu v. High-Forest Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Fiegl v. 1695 Ridge Road Webster Inn Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adamy v. ZiriakusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Donato v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Reynolds v. StudleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Gray v. HedlundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Kelly v. P.B.L. Enters., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API