Legal Opinion
Bower v. D'Onfro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 8, 1995No. 12161PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendants Bradley D. Ausmus and Lin Ausmus appeal1 from a judgment awarding money damages after a jury trial in an automobile negligence case. They claim that the trial court improperly (1) refused to permit testimony and evidence of the plaintiffs failure to wear a seat belt on the basis of General Statutes § 14-100a (c) (4), (2) applied the collateral sources statute to this case, (3) awarded prejudgment interest under the offer of judgment statute, General Statutes § 52-192a, (4) excluded judicial and evidentiary admissions, (5) permitted evidence of racing, and (6) found that there…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Nash v. YapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Huff v. ShumateDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2004
- Rockwell v. RockwellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.