Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n of Pennsylvania v. Department of Public Welfare

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 2003Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

I concur with the Majority’s decision to overrule the first preliminary objection of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) and Secretary Feather O. Houstoun (hereafter Respondents) as to Petitioners’ standing to bring their action. I respectfully dissent, however, from the Majority’s decision to sustain Respondents’ remaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the claims raised in Petitioners’ petition for review.

Petitioners have averred that the disputed language of the General Appropria*1208tion Act of 2002, Act of June…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Pennsylvania ex rel. George v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Baravordeh v. Borough Council of Prospect ParkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Biles v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API