Legal Opinion

Federal Oil Co. v. Peoples Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1930No. 27,745PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, ‘ J.

Plaintiff appeals from the order denying its motion in the alternative' for judgment or a new trial.

The action was upon a trade acceptance, for $1,187.52 due in 90 days after December 1, 1925, upon which defendant had stopped payment. The plaintiff’s cause of action was admitted; but as a counterclaim thereto the answer alleged that said acceptance and two others already paid, each in substantially the same amount as the one in suit, were given for a quantity of Federal Oak Motor Oil and Oak Gear Go sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. That the motor oil was warranted to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sassen v. HaegleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Robertson v. BurtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. White Pine Lumber Co. Inc. v. Madsen PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Soderberg v. CrosierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Washington Lubricating Co. v. American Sales Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Columbia Axle Co. v. American Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  4. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API