Legal Opinion

United States v. Raymont Wright

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 17, 2019No. 17-1972Published

1DissentNygaard, Circuit Judge

This appeal presents us with two issues: First, does a district court possess the inherent power to dismiss an indictment after serial hung juries, and second, did the District Court here abuse its discretion by dismissing this indictment after two of them. I answer yes to the first and no to the second. Because I view this to be a matter of substantial importance, I must respectfully dissent. 1

As the majority notes, twice now, the Government has tried Raymont Wright for a violation of federal law: being a felon in possession of a firearm. 2 Twice now, the Government has done so on the basis…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API