Legal Opinion

Sheriff v. Vlasak

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1995No. 24893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*60OPINION

By the Court,

Steffen, C. J.:

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether NRS 201.020, which criminalizes a parent’s “persistent” failure to provide “support and maintenance” for his or her children, is unconstitutionally vague. For the reasons explained hereafter, we conclude that the challenged statute is not unconstitutional and we therefore reverse the district court’s order.

FACTS

The respondent, David Vlasak, married nonparty Rita Gray in 1982, fathered two children, and was divorced from Gray in 1986. The divorce decree ordered Vlasak to pay monthly child support in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woofter v. O'DONNELLNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wilmeth v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State of Nevada v. Father RichardNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cunningham v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Epp v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Williams v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Sang Man Shin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re ShinNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Sheriff v. VlasakNevada Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API