Legal Opinion

Ochs v. Blankenship

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1964No. 43,447Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the orders and judgment of the trial court that certain instruments, a contract and two instruments designated as “Sale of Oil and Gas Royalty,” were recorded in compliance with G. S. 1949, 79-420, quieting title of the Mid-American Oil Company and the Gulf Coast Western Oil Company, as owners of an undivided 14/32 interest in the minerals in place in and under the following real estate: “The South Half (S/2) of Section 26 Township 23 South, Range 26 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Hodgeman County,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fitch v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Cherokee & Pittsburg Coal & Mining Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Burgin v. NewmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Johnson v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Ferguson v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API