Gee v. Hasbrouck
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Joseph; Yaple, J. Elizabeth Gee and Rebecca M. Ennis appealed from an order of the probate court allowing the account of Joseph B. Hasbrouck and John J. Hasbrouck, as administrators with the will annexed of the estate of John Hasbrouck, deceased. The order was substantially affirmed in the circuit, and said appellants bring error.'
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
John Hasbrouck died testate in the year 1869, possessed of considerable personal- property, but no real estate. He left a widow, Rachel, and several sons and daughters. No executor was named in his will, but two of his sons, viz., Joseph B. and John J., the defendants herein, were, appointed administrators'with the will annexed, the will having been duly admitted to probate. The estate was appraised-at $12,092.93, and claims aggregating $4,046.88 were allowed by commissioners and paid. Rachel died on December 8, 1896. The administrators having filed no account in probate court, the appellants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glover v. ReidMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Proctor v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Hull v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Cole v. Cole's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Cousino v. CousinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Chamberlain v. HuselMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Walsh v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Michigan Trust Co. v. HertzigMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Webb v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1902