Legal Opinion

Fairchild Publications Divsion of Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. Rosston, Kremer & Slawter, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Helen E. Freedman, J.

This case addresses the issue whether an advertising agency which has placed print advertisements for a third party is liable to the publisher for payment.

Plaintiff (Fairchild) is a magazine publisher; defendant Rosston, Kremer & Slawter, Inc. (RKS) is an advertising agency *29which has placed advertising with Fairchild since 1948. In January 1989, RKS forwarded to Fairchild two "insertion orders”, i.e., orders for publication, for the advertising of defendant Fabrican, Inc. (Fabrican), a home furnishings manufacturer which filed for bankruptcy after this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Savoy Record Co. v. Cardinal Export Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Angerosa v. White CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. J. K. Rishel Furniture Co. v. Stuyvesant Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1924
  5. New York Times Co. v. Glynn-Palmer Associates, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API