Legal Opinion · Dissent

Independent Community Bankers Ass'n of South Dakota v. State Ex Rel. Meierhenry

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1984No. 14288Published

1Dissent

HENDERSON,

Justice (dissenting).

I join in Justice - Dunn’s dissent which would strike down Senate Bill 256 of the 1983 South Dakota Session Laws as being unconstitutional as it violates Article III, § 21 of the South Dakota Constitution. Senate Bill 256 clearly embraces more than one subject for it amends four separate and distinct, pre-existing original acts. These *747original acts, sought to be amended, pertain to (1) bank holding companies, (2) ownership of banks, (3) taxation of banks, and (4) taxation of insurance companies. The State of South Dakota fought like a tiger to spread before this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WaldronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. BasfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bull v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. McClellan v. Judge of Recorder's Court of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API