Legal Opinion
Barber v. Grow
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 10, 1996No. 2:94-cv-05858PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Defendant William Grow has filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Richard I. Barber’s claims against him. These claims are asserted under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution via a Bivens claim and a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. Growls Motion also includes an alternative request for Summary Judgment and a request to substitute the United States as Defendant on any claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (1994) (FTCA) and then to dismiss those claims as jurisdictionally premature.
Barber is an inmate in a federal prison; he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ortiz v. PearsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Maurello v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Green v. ThorykDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Mabine v. VaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Blackcloud v. CunninghamDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.