Legal Opinion

State v. VanWert

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1989No. C3-88-883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

The decisive issue in this criminal appeal is whether the trial court prejudicially erred in its response to a jury question concerning the elements of the offense of criminal vehicular operation resulting in injury, Minn.Stat. § 609.21, subd. 2 (1988). We hold that the trial court erred and that the error was prejudicial. The decision of the court of appeals is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial. 1

On the evening of June 29, 1987, defendant YanWert played softball, went to a bar, and then, according to his evidence, went to his mother’s residence, where he ate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. State v. VanWertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HegstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. JaworskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. State v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. In Re the Welfare of J.G.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. State v. RasinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API