State v. VanWert
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Justice.
The decisive issue in this criminal appeal is whether the trial court prejudicially erred in its response to a jury question concerning the elements of the offense of criminal vehicular operation resulting in injury, Minn.Stat. § 609.21, subd. 2 (1988). We hold that the trial court erred and that the error was prejudicial. The decision of the court of appeals is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial. 1
On the evening of June 29, 1987, defendant YanWert played softball, went to a bar, and then, according to his evidence, went to his mother’s residence, where he ate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. VanWertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HegstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. JaworskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- In Re the Welfare of J.G.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. RasinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.