Legal Opinion
QR Spex, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 18, 2007No. 4:06-cv-00124PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FOLSOM, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above styled cause of action is Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss, Sever, and/or Transfer (Doc. No. 25). Also before the Court are QR Spex’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Joint Motion (Doc. No. 29), Defendants’ Reply Brief in Support of their motion (Doc. No. 37), and QR Spex’s Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 44). After reviewing the parties’ briefing and the relevant law, the Court is of the opinion that the Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss, Sever, and/or Transfer should be GRANTED as follows.
(I) Background
QR Spex originally…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. Medallion Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012
- Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. v. Go Satellite Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- 721 Bourbon, Inc. v. House of Auth, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Sprint Communications, L.P. v. Cox Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Alert 24 Security, LLC v. Tyco International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.