Dietrich v. Martin
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Gallatin County; F. F. Armstrong, Judge. ' Action by Louis Dietrich against J. E. Martin and another on a redelivery bond given in attachment proceedings. From a judgment in favor of defendants, and an order overruling a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
1Per curiam
— In 1891 plaintiff commenced an action in the district court of the Ninth judicial district against a “steam dredge and amalgamator,” an alleged “boat,” described in the complaint as having been used as a steam dredge or shovel, with an amalgamator attached, for dredging streams, and which was at the time of attachment upon the Jefferson river, a nonnavigable stream, in the county of Gallatin, state of Montana. Plaintiff in that action proceeded under Chapter Y of Title YII of the First Division of the Code of Civil Procedure (Compiled Statutes of 1887), relating to the attachment of boats,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dietrich v. Steam Dredge & AmalgamatorMontana Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burke v. Inter-State Savings & Loan Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1901
- Henderson v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Copper Queen Consolidated Mining Co. v. Territorial Board of Equalization of the TerritoryArizona Supreme Court · 1906
- Story Gold Dredging Co. v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1938
- Sloan v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.