Handley v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
The pivotal issue in these appeals 1 is whether the trial court erred in determining whether a witness was qualified to testify as an expert. We believe error was committed and reverse and remand the case for a new trial.
After trial by jury in the superior court, Joseph Handley was convicted of first degree murder 2 and shooting with in- tent to kill. 3 Handley’s defense to each of those charges was one of diminished capacity. 4 While he did not dispute the state’s allegation that he had shot two people, killing one of them, Handley claimed that these acts were done…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Lewis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Ferrell v. BaxterAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Osborne v. HurstAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Evans v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Staael v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Doisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
- Marsingill v. O'MALLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.