Legal Opinion

Handley v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1980No. 3946, 4935PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

The pivotal issue in these appeals 1 is whether the trial court erred in determining whether a witness was qualified to testify as an expert. We believe error was committed and reverse and remand the case for a new trial.

After trial by jury in the superior court, Joseph Handley was convicted of first degree murder 2 and shooting with in- tent to kill. 3 Handley’s defense to each of those charges was one of diminished capacity. 4 While he did not dispute the state’s allegation that he had shot two people, killing one of them, Handley claimed that these acts were done…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lewis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Ferrell v. BaxterAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Osborne v. HurstAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Evans v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Staael v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Doisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  5. Marsingill v. O'MALLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API