Legal Opinion

Boster v. Ches. & Ohio R'y Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

cited 34 W. Ya. 65 ; 29 0. St. 126; Woods Biy Law § 364; 20 lip. Can. Q. B. 27; Id. 24; 11 Lea 98 ; 45 la. 69; 50 la. 79 ; 45 Mich 184. cited 34 W. Ya. 73; 33 W. Va. 423.

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Judge:

This is an action of trespass on the case, brought on the 27th day of June, 1889, in the Circuit Court of Cabell county, by plaintiff, Boster, against the railway company, charging it with having unlawfully ejected him from its train. There was a demurrer by defendant; overruled; polea of not guilty; trial by jury; a verdict for five hundred dollars; motion by defendant to set the same aside; motion overruled, and judgment given. On exceptions taken by defendant it has obtained this appeal.

The relation between the passenger and the common carrier is now generally treated as one of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goddard v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
  2. Farish & Co. v. ReigleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  3. McKay v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farish & Co. v. ReigleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  2. Trice v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Nichols v. Camden &c Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Scott v. Chesapeake & O. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Beuke v. Boggs Run Mining & Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API