Legal Opinion

Miner v. Husted

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1916No. Docket No. 6Published

Appeal from Kent; McDonald, J. Bill by Frank E. Miner against Nina Husted, executrix of the last will and testament of N. P. Sylvester Husted, and others, for specific performance of a certain contract, for an accounting, and for other relief. From a decree for defendants, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

The bill of complaint in this case was filed to enforce the performance of a certain contract, for an accounting, and for other relief.

The Allmetal Manufacturing Company, one of the defendants herein, is a corporation organized under the laws of this State. On the 22d day of October, 1912, the company was the owner of certain property situated in the city of Grand Rapids, including machinery, raw and manufactured materials, stationery, and office equipment, and also a certain written contract, dated June 8, 1912, with one J. E. Kresky, hereinafter called the Kresky contract. The said Kresky…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Benedict v. . ArnouxNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Stevenson v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API