Legal Opinion
Brady v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 14, 1981No. 80-3139PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PANNER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Brady and Crawford, appearing pro se, appeal the dismissal of their consolidated actions.1 They challenge conditions of their confinement in a federal penitentiary and seek injunctive relief and punitive damages for violation of their constitutional rights against the Attorney General of the United States, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, and the Warden of the Penitentiary. The district court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss because appellants failed to exhaust administrative remedies and because the claims were moot.
We affirm.
HISTORY
In 1977,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Herbert M. Crawford v. Griffin Bell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Norman D. Carter and Cecilia P. Carter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Luchai Ruviwat v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the U.S. And Robert Christensen, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Brady v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Garcia v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.