Legal Opinion
Tirapelli v. Advanced Equities, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 15, 2002No. 01 C 3342PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court are (1) defendants’ motions in limine and (2) defendants’ motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). For the following reasons, the court: (1) grants in part and denies in part defendants’ motions in limine and (2) grants in part and denies in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment as follows. The court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Count I of plaintiffs’ complaint. On its own motion, the court dismisses Counts II and III of plaintiffs’ complaint without…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Michelle Brazinski v. Amoco Petroleum Additives Company and Buck IsbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stewart v. Estate of SteinerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Stewart v. Estate of SteinerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Tirapelli v. Advanced Equities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Somerville v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003