Zimmerman v. Direct Federal Credit Union
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ON DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR FOR NEW TRIAL OR REMITTI-TUR (# 200)
COLLINGS, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
On the fifteenth day of trial the jury returned a split verdict, favoring the plain tiff Celia G. Zimmerman (“Zimmerman”) on certain of her claims and the defendants Direct Federal Credit Union (“Direct”) and David Breslin (“Breslin”) on others. More specifically, on the claims submitted to the jury for determination 2 Zimmerman was awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages on her claim of retaliation under state law…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gonzalez-Bermudez v. Abbott Labs. PR Inc.United States District Court · 2018