Legal Opinion

Ricci v. Memorial Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court (Kahn, J.), entered February 14, 1994 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order.

Control of disclosure is within the sphere of the trial court’s broad discretionary power and, absent abuse, should not be disturbed (see, Dunlap v United Health Servs., 189 AD2d 1072; Soper v Wilkinson Match [USA], 176 AD2d 1025). Applying *787this principle here, we affirm since we agree with Supreme Court that defendant did not establish the necessity for a second physical examination and, more particularly, a psychiatric examination…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. United Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Soper v. Wilkinson Match (USA), Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Geary v. Hunton & WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Besicorp Group, Inc. v. EnowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Washburn v. A.W. Lawrence & CoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Santiago v. Pyramid Crossgates Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Harvey v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API