Legal Opinion

State v. Ameqrane

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 21, 2010No. 2D09-3018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VILLANTI, Judge.

The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Othmane Ameqrane’s motion to suppress. The trial court concluded that a police officer who conducted a traffic stop of Ameqrane’s vehicle did not possess the requisite reasonable suspicion that Ameqrane’s faculties were impaired by alcohol so as to justify the officer’s request that he perform a horizontal gaze nystag-mus (HGN) field sobriety test or any other field sobriety test. Based upon the uncon-troverted facts, we conclude that the trial court erred in its legal conclusion and, therefore, reverse and remand for further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. State v. K.S.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. STATE, DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY v. HaskinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Santiago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. State v. CastanedaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. STATE OF FLORIDA v. ELIANA VELASCODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  4. State of Florida v. Kevin TysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  5. State of Florida v. Michelle Lynn HowardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API