State v. K.S.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The State appeals an order granting KS.’s motion to suppress a firearm seized during a search of K.S.’s vehicle and K.S.’s statements to law enforcement relating to his ownership or use of the firearm. Because the circumstances surrounding K.S.’s arrest did not justify a search incident to a lawful arrest, we conclude that the search was unreasonable and that the trial court properly granted the motion to suppress based on Arizona v. Gant, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009). Accordingly, we affirm.
At the hearing on K.S.’s motion to suppress, an officer of the St. Petersburg…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mullis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- State v. AmeqraneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Villanueva v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Horne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.