Legal Opinion

State v. K.S.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 5, 2010No. 2D09-2790PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The State appeals an order granting KS.’s motion to suppress a firearm seized during a search of K.S.’s vehicle and K.S.’s statements to law enforcement relating to his ownership or use of the firearm. Because the circumstances surrounding K.S.’s arrest did not justify a search incident to a lawful arrest, we conclude that the search was unreasonable and that the trial court properly granted the motion to suppress based on Arizona v. Gant, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009). Accordingly, we affirm.

At the hearing on K.S.’s motion to suppress, an officer of the St. Petersburg…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mullis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. State v. AmeqraneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Villanueva v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Horne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API