Legal Opinion

Industrial Sav. Bank v. Mitchell

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1932No. 6 Div. 892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The case went to the jury upon counts 1 and 2 of the complaint. To each of these counts appellant interposed numerous grounds of demurrer, but the only objection urged in brief is that one count contains two causes of action. The gravamen of each is a personal wrong, of the nature invol red in Engle v. Simmons, 148 Ala. 92, 41 So. 1023, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 96, 121 Am. St. Rep. 59, 12 Ann. Cas. 740. The additional averments, by way of inducement, of facts giving color and tone and furnishing the background of the basic facts relied upon for a recovery, do not cause a separate cause of action.

App…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Engle v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. City of Birmingham v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Snedecor v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Mobile, J. &. K. C. R. R. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Holman v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bank of Loretto v. BoboAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Pumphrey v. Empire Lath and PlasterMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Chastain & Blass Real Estate & Insurance v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Resolute Fire Ins. Co. v. O'RearAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Industrial Savings Bank v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API