International & G. N. Railroad v. Smith County
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Smith. Tried below before the Hon. John C. Eobertson. Motion to dismiss.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Chief Justice.
The motion to dismiss the appeal objects to the appeal bond because it describes the judgment as against the Int. & G. 17. E. E. Co. for the sum of $25 costs, when in fact the judgment for costs was against said company, and also against Geo. M. Dilley and Martin Hmzie.
*75By referring to the judgment we find that it is as stated in the motion, Dilley and Hinzie being designated as sureties on the injunction bond of plaintiff. This objection is, not that the bond fails to identify the case, or the judgment, but that it fails to describe the judgment fully, the defect being in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Linn v. ArambouldTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Scott v. BurtonTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Rodrigues v. TrevinoTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Green v. BanksTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Herndon v. BremondTexas Supreme Court · 1856
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Mignon v. BrinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Bradford v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Stewart v. LenoirCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.