Legal Opinion
Gadomski v. Patelco Credit Union
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 24, 2020No. 2:17-cv-00695Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KELLIE GADOMSKI, individually and on No. 2:17-cv-00695-TLN-AC behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 Patelco Credit Union, 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Patelco Credit Union’s (“Defendant”) 18 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12 19 (c). (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff Kellie Gadomski (“Plaintiff”) filed an Opposition (ECF No. 18) and 20 Defendant replied (ECF No. 20). For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Fleming v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.