Legal Opinion

City of Dunkirk v. Wallace

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1898No. 1,944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

— The material facts charged in the complaint are that on October 7, 1891, John Reese and John Hayes, under the firm name of Hayes & Reese, entered into a written contract with the appellant to improve a certain street in said city; that before said work was commenced Reese sublet his interest in said improvement contract to Edward Stack and John Buckley; that afterwards, and before the work was begun, Hayes, Stack, and Buckley, sublet the work to appellee; that thereupon the appellee and Hayes, Stack, and Buck-ley entered into a written contract whereby appellee agreed to fulfill the terms…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sage v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Reilly v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Donnelly v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Richter v. MeyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. McCormack v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broad v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Blain v. City of DelphiIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. City of Newcastle v. DingleIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. City of Laporte v. AhlbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Frederick v. City of Bonner SpringsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API