City of Dunkirk v. Wallace
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Jay Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
— The material facts charged in the complaint are that on October 7, 1891, John Reese and John Hayes, under the firm name of Hayes & Reese, entered into a written contract with the appellant to improve a certain street in said city; that before said work was commenced Reese sublet his interest in said improvement contract to Edward Stack and John Buckley; that afterwards, and before the work was begun, Hayes, Stack, and Buckley, sublet the work to appellee; that thereupon the appellee and Hayes, Stack, and Buck-ley entered into a written contract whereby appellee agreed to fulfill the terms…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sage v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Reilly v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Donnelly v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Richter v. MeyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- McCormack v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Broad v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Blain v. City of DelphiIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Newcastle v. DingleIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- City of Laporte v. AhlbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
- Frederick v. City of Bonner SpringsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.