Legal Opinion

Daenzer v. Wayland Ford, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 9, 2002No. 1:01-CV-133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Revised Motion for Partial Summary Judgment On The Issue of Damages. Plaintiff, as class representative, was previously granted summary judgment on the issue of liability as to her Truth in Lending Act (TILA) claim, her Michigan Consumer Protection Act (MCPA) claim, and her Motor Vehicle Installment Sales Contract Act (MVISCA) claim.

I. Facts

The Court relies on its previous recitations of the relevant facts in other Opinions issued in this matter.

II. Standard of Review

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Warcholek v. Medical Collections System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  4. Klopfenstein v. Fifth Third BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API