Legal Opinion

Rappaport v. Vance

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 10, 1993No. Civ. Y-92-2252PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.

Defendants seek Partial Summary Judgment to deny attorney’s fees to Plaintiff Nolan Rappaport, a lawyer who acted pro se in certain proceedings under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA or the Act), 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. Because the facts are not in dispute, the Court may decide as a matter of law whether pro se litigants who are lawyers are entitled to fees under the Act. F.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Since the Supreme Court has denied pro se lawyer's fees under Title VII for reasons that apply equally here, the Court will deny…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Bonnes v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  3. Jephunneh Lawrence v. Charles A. Bowsher, Comptroller General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  4. Rossi v. GoslingDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Devine Ex Rel. Devine v. Indian River County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Doe v. Board of Education of Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. McLaughlin Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. Boston School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  4. Miller v. West Lafayette Community School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mayerson v. DeBuonoNew York Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API