Legal Opinion

Casey v. Proctor

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1963No. L. A. 26961Published

1Opinion of the Court

59 Cal.2d 97 (1963)

378 P.2d 579

28 Cal. Rptr. 307

WILLIAM CASEY, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

ROBERT CHARLES PROCTOR, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 26961.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

February 14, 1963.

Harney, Drummond & Fitzwater and David M. Harney for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Murchison, Cumming, Baker & Velpmen, John Baker and Henry F. Walker for Defendant and Respondent.

PETERS, J.

In this action for personal injuries, defendant alleged as a special affirmative defense that plaintiff had signed a release discharging him from all liability, and that the action was barred.…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API