Legal Opinion
Taussig v. McNamara
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 7, 1963No. Civ. A. 167-63PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.
Plaintiff is a regular retired officer of the United States Navy. He receives pay, but is not on active duty. He alleges that he is currently self-employed as a government business management consultant and industrial representative in Washington, D. C., representing clients who have the “general desire” to sell to various government departments, including the Department of the Navy.
Plaintiff filed an action against the Secretaries of Defense and Navy, and the Attorney General, for declaratory judgment, alleging the unconstitutionality of certain acts of Congress and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Thomas F. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Puglisi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Field v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Applicability of 18 U.S.C. § 281 to Selling Activities of Retired Military Officers, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1981
- Henry C. Field, Jr. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense Henry C. Field, Jr. v. Harold Brown Joseph E. Hoker v. Harold Brown. James G. Little v. W. Graham Claytor, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.