Legal Opinion

Becker v. County of Oneida

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1913Published

Submission of controversies upon agreed statements of facts, pursuant to section' 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Kruse, P. J.:

The question which we are asked to answer by the submission in these cases is, whether the several claims therein mantioned are legal claims against the defendant, the county of Oneida. ' If the claims are found to be legal charges against the county, then it is provided by the submission that judgment shall be rendered against the defendant for the amount of the claims, or such part thereof as shall be found to be a legal charge against the county, together with such interest and such costs as are equitable. If not a legal charge, then judgment shall be rendered dismissing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. McCabe v. . MatthiesNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Albrecht v. Queens CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hanrahan v. . Terminal Station CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Bank of Staten Island v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Bank of Staten Island v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API