Gaines, Emhof, Metzler & Kriner v. Nisberg
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, District Judge.
This is a copyright infringement case in which plaintiff Gaines, Emhof, Metzler & Kriner asserts that defendant Jay Nisberg misappropriated a publication that it describes as its “marketing guide.” Defendant has moved to dismiss on grounds of improper venue and insufficiency of service of process, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(5). Item 4. In the alternative, he has moved that if the court declines to dismiss the complaint, venue be transferred to the Southern District of New York, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) or § 1406(a). Plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Milwaukee Concrete Studios, Limited v. Fjeld Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, and Janice KruegerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Banque De La Mediterranee-France, S.A. v. Thergen, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- AJ Taft Coal Co., Inc. v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2003
- Abramoff v. Shake Consulting, L.L.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Central Sports Army Club v. Arena Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Rogers v. Civil Air PatrolDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.