Legal Opinion
Cathey Quantock v. Shared Marketing Services, Inc., and Rick Lattanzio
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 12, 2002No. 02-2258PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Per curiam
Cathey Quantock claims that she was subjected to unlawful sexual harassment when her boss asked her for sex, she reported it to a supervisor, and her employer did nothing about it. She sued her employer, Shared Marketing Services, Inc., for sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and her boss, Rick Lattan-zio, for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on both counts, and denied Quantock’s motion for partial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Susan McKENZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Judith Hilt-Dyson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Vincent J. Krocka, Cross-Appellee v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Ann M. Hostetler v. Quality Dining, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Sally Naeem v. McKesson Drug Company and Dan MontreuilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Nischan v. Stratosphere Quality, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- William R. Hrobowski v. Worthington Steel Company and Worthington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Jose Garcia v. Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Police Pension Board, and George SteinerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Bergbauer v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.