Legal Opinion

De Urbaez v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment granted and case remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Presiding Justice Francis T. Murphy at the Appellate Division (116 AD2d 534, 535-538). We add only that clause 17 of the policy is applicable notwithstanding the fact that the claim against the insurance company is for first-party benefits required by Insurance Law article 51. Under Insurance Law § 5103, no-fault insurance is mandated as a part of every owner’s liability…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Urbaez v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kujbida v. Horizon Insurance Agency, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Brentwood Pain & Rehabilitation Services, P.C. v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. In re the Arbitration between Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. & BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. BRENTWOOD PAIN & REHABILITATION SERV. v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API