Brentwood Pain & Rehabilitation Services, P.C. v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
Since 1896, x-ray technology has enabled doctors to “see” inside patients’ bodies without the risks of surgery. More recently, physicians have employed other imaging technologies, including Magnetic Resonance Imaging (“MRI”), to examine patients’ brains, muscles, and organs without a scalpel or the risks of anesthesia and infection.
X-ray and MRI technology are both similar and different. In an x-ray, the image is produced by passing electrons through the body and onto film or a fluorescent light. The ultimate image, which is essentially a shadow of the body, shows…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- R.G. Group, Inc., and R.G. Restaurant Associates v. The Horn & Hardart Company, and Bojangles' of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- BRENTWOOD PAIN & REHABILITATION SERV. v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Hunter v. Debmar-Mercury LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023