Legal Opinion

Mohammad Alim v. KBR, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2014No. 13-11094UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Mohammad Z. Alim appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to remand and motion to vacate the underlying arbitration award, as well as the district court’s grant of KBR, Inc.’s (“KBR”) motion to compel arbitration. We AFFIRM.

I. Factual and Procedural History

As part of Alim’s employment with KBR, Alim agreed to the Halliburton Dispute Resolution Plan (“DRP”), 1 which provided that all claims against KBR related to Alim’s employment must be submitted to arbitration. Following his termination, Alim filed an arbitration demand with the American Arbitration Association…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. LeMaire v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jamison v. Harbor Freight Tools Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2024
  2. Russell v. RichDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API