Legal Opinion

Edwards & Daniel v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1927No. 5469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

1. This was a suit upon a sworn open account, as provided in the Civil Code (1910), § 4730, the same being an unliquidated demand. The affidavit as to correctness of the account antedated, and like the account was attached to, the original summons as a part thereof. The original summons, properly construed in connection with the sworn account, was a suit upon an unliquidated demand for $100 as principal debt, and $16.33 interest, the amount sworn to be due in the affidavit. The demand for the amount above stated was in effect a disclaimer for any part of the principal debt in excess of $100.

2.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jennings v. StriplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Scott v. BedellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Doughty, Pearson & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  4. Mills v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Dalton City Co. v. HaddockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hester v. Dixie Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Thompson v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Landau Bros. v. ToweryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Smith v. Atlanta Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API