Legal Opinion

Smith v. Atlanta Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1930No. 20535PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where an insured in a life-insurance policy, in a suit against the insurer to recover for an alleged breach of the contract, alleges his damage as being in the amount of the premiums which have been paid on the policy, the amount of the damage is fixed and certain, and constitutes a liquidated demand which, in a suit in a justice’s court, the insured can not, without the consent of the insurer, reduce in order to bring the case within the monetary jurisdiction of the justice’s court. Jennings v. Stripling, 127 Ga. 778 (56 S. E. 1026) ; Brantley-Groover Co. v. Ivey, 149 Ga. 263 (2 a) (99 S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jennings v. StriplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Edwards & Daniel v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Brantley-Groover Hardware Co. v. IveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitlock v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Cromer v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Garrison v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API