Legal Opinion
Fred 26 Importers, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland Security
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 23, 2006No. CV 05-03477 DDPPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PREGERSON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment filed by the defendants and the plaintiffs. After reviewing the parties’ arguments, the Court grants the plaintiffs’ motion and denies the defendants’ motion.
I. Background
Fred 26 Importers, Inc. (“Fred 26”) and Christine Sagmit (“Sagmit”) (collectively the “plaintiffs”), bring this action against the United States Department of Homeland Security and the United States Citizenship and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northwest Motorcycle Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Occidental Engineering Company v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Tongatapu Woodcraft Hawaii, Ltd. v. Sam I. Feldman, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caremax Inc v. HolderDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Innova Solutions, Inc. v. BaranDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Ching Yee Wong v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- David Parsons & Associates Inc. v. RidgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Mishra v. RichardsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021